Skip to main content

Tools to Make Patch Management Easier


Manual patching across hundreds or thousands of devices is unrealistic. The good news is that there are tools, some free or low-cost, that can help automate and streamline the process.


1. Action1 (Cloud Patch Management)

  • Free for up to 200 endpoints.
  • Cloud-based, no on-prem server required.
  • Works across Windows environments.
  • Features: Patch deployment, reporting, and remote software installation.


Great fit for smaller districts or those with limited infrastructure.


2. Mosyle (for macOS/iOS Devices)

  • Cloud-native Apple device management.
  • Automates macOS and iOS patching.
  • Free tier available for smaller deployments.


Excellent choice for schools running large Apple fleets.


3. Microsoft Intune (Education Licensing)

  • Often already included in Microsoft 365 A3/A5 education licenses.
  • Provides centralized patch management for Windows devices.
  • Supports compliance policies and reporting.


Best if your district is already invested in Microsoft’s ecosystem.


4. WSUS (Windows Server Update Services)

  • Free Microsoft tool for on-prem environments.
  • Allows centralized control of Windows updates.
  • Requires server resources and management.


Good for districts that prefer on-prem solutions and already run Windows Server.


5. PDQ Deploy & PDQ Inventory

  • Paid solution, but discounted for education.
  • Great for patching third-party applications (Java, Chrome, Zoom, etc.).
  • Easy scripting and deployment.


Good for IT teams that need more control beyond OS patches.


6. Open-Source Options (for Linux / Mixed Environments)

  • Ansible: Automates patching across Linux servers/workstations.
  • Chocolatey (Windows): Package manager to script application updates.
  • Munki (macOS): Open-source tool for app patching and distribution.


Useful for districts with diverse environments or tech-savvy IT teams.


Best Practices for Patch Management in Schools

  1. Prioritize Critical Updates – Apply security patches as soon as possible, especially for internet-facing systems.
  2. Test Before Deploying Broadly – Use a small pilot group to ensure patches don’t break instructional apps.
  3. Automate Where Possible – Use MDM tools (Intune, Mosyle, JAMF) to reduce manual work.
  4. Report and Verify – Always generate reports to confirm compliance (useful for ITEC 7230a audits).
  5. Don’t Forget Third-Party Apps – Browsers, Zoom, Java, and Adobe products often introduce as much risk as the OS.


Patch management isn’t glamorous, but it’s one of the most impactful cybersecurity practices schools can implement. By aligning with ITEC 7230a and NIST CSF 2.0, districts strengthen security and meet compliance obligations.


Even resource-constrained IT teams can build a sustainable patch management program with free and low-cost tools like Action1, Mosyle, and WSUS.


At the end of the day, patch management is about protecting students, staff, and the learning environment from preventable disruptions.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Why Securing Things “Backwards” Is So Difficult in K–12 IT

Many K–12 districts are facing a difficult reality: after years of convenience-first technology use, the time has come to adopt a more secure, structured approach. Cyber insurance requirements are tightening. State and federal regulations are growing. Threats are increasing. And school systems are expected to modernize their security posture quickly and without disrupting learning. But strengthening security in a district that has operated with wide-open access for years isn’t just a technical challenge; it’s a cultural renovation. Transitioning from “anything goes” to “secured by design” is one of the hardest shifts for schools to make. Not because people don’t care about security, but because securing things backwards means undoing years of habits, expectations, and legacy decisions. Here’s why it’s so difficult , and how districts can make the transition without breaking what’s working. Why Securing Things Backwards Is Hard 1. You’re Taking Away What People Are Used To When classr...

Vendor and Third-Party Risk Management in K–12: Protecting Student Data Beyond Your Walls

Modern school districts rely on hundreds of third-party applications, ranging from learning management systems and browser extensions to assessment platforms and parent communication tools. Each of these vendors connects to your network, accesses your data, or processes sensitive student information. Every one of them represents potential risk. While internal defenses like patching, MFA, and backups are essential, vendor risk management ensures your district is protected from vulnerabilities that originate outside your network . Why Vendor Risk Management Matters for Schools School technology ecosystems have expanded rapidly over the last decade. What used to be a handful of software systems is now a web of cloud tools, integrations, and data sharing agreements. Without strong oversight, this complexity creates real-world risk: Data Breaches via EdTech Vendors: Many school breaches occur not from internal attacks, but through compromised third-party systems. Privacy Compliance Exp...

Incident Response for Schools: Why Playbooks Matter

When a cybersecurity incident occurs, such as a phishing email, ransomware outbreak, or accidental exposure of student data, the first few minutes are crucial. Yet, many school districts lack a clear, step-by-step plan for responding. The result? Confusion, delayed decisions, extended downtime, and even compliance failures. That’s why every school should have Incident Response (IR) playbooks : simple, one-page guides that outline who to call, what to do, and how to contain and recover from common incidents. Why Playbooks Are Critical in Schools Clarity Under Pressure: When panic sets in, playbooks provide structure. Staff know exactly what steps to take. Consistency: Every incident is handled the same way, reducing the risk of mistakes. Compliance: For Kansas schools, ITEC 7230a requires incident response planning and documentation. Playbooks help districts meet that standard. Framework Alignment: The NIST Cybersecurity Framework (CSF) 2.0 emphasizes Respond as o...